審稿規則

《高大法學論叢》審稿規則

審稿規則PDF檔下載

(2010年05月19日高大法學論叢編輯委員會議決議內容修訂)

一、為維持「高大法學論叢」之學術品質,全部來稿應依本規則審查。

二、審查由總編輯商請相關領域專家學者行之,採雙向匿名審查。來稿與本刊性質或格式不符者,總編輯可得為形式退稿之決定。

三、審查人應就送審稿件為同意刊登、不同意刊登、同意修改後刊登、修改後送原審稿人審查等之建議。編審委員會應就審查人所提建議為同意刊登或不同意刊登之決定。

四、稿件數量如超過編幅容量,總編輯得依領域平衡及論文時效性等原則,決定刊登之稿件。

五、來稿作者如有要求開具刊登證明,總編輯應俟審查程序完畢後,始得依實際進度開具刊登證明或同意刊登證明。

六、本規則經高大法學論叢編輯委員會通過後實施,修正時亦同。

 

National University of Kaohsiung Law Journal Regulations for Examining and Approving Manuscripts

Last amended by the editorial board of National University of Kaohsiung Law Journal according to the decision content on 19 May 2010

Article 1
In order to maintain the quality of National University of Kaohsiung Law Journal (hereinafter, NUK Law Journal), all manuscripts submitted should be reviewed in accordance with these regulations.

Article 2
The editor-in-chief should invite qualified specialists and scholars with appropriate expertise to conduct reviews, which must be anonymous bi-directionally. The editor-in-chief may make the decision of refusal for manuscripts which are not in line with NUK Law Journal’s orientation or format.

Article 3
Reviews should categorize a manuscript as “accepted for publication”, “not suitable for publication” and “accepted for publication only after revision” or “re-reviewed by the original reviewer after revision”. The editorial board should decide whether to publish a manuscript in terms of reviewers’ comments.

Article 4
If manuscripts accepted for publication exceed the page limit of an issue, the editor-in chief shall, upon his/her discretion, make selections based on balance of fields and/or urgency.

Article 5
Proof of publication or acceptance for publication, if requested, can be issued by the editor-in-chief accordingly, but only upon the satisfactory completion of the review process.

Article 6
The regulations herein and any amendment thereto take effect upon the ratification by the editorial board of NUK Law Journal.